Features of Windows 7 and Google Chrome OS

•October 22, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Windows 7 is the new operating system recently launched by Microsoft. Many people were disappointed with Vista as there were very few new features when compared to XP, and the annoying security made it a very poor predecessor. Microsoft hopes that this new operating system will gain back peoples respect with its many features and user friendy appearance. Here are some of the features: Big-screen support, Start button search, BitLocker To Go, Document libraries, Nag-free System Tray, Drag and snap windows, Location-aware printing, UAC silencer, and Media streamer playback.

                         Google Chrome OS is a new operating system. Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010. Because we’re already talking to partners about the project, and we’ll soon be working with the open source community, we wanted to share our vision now so everyone understands what we are trying to achieve. Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We’re designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

,

Scary Fly

•September 29, 2009 • Leave a Comment

scaryfly copyAfter biting a lion living near a radiation power plant the fly began to form the features of a lion.

Uses for google sketchup

•May 1, 2009 • Leave a Comment

What is it? Google SketchUp is software that you can use to create 3D models of anything you like. It measures the length of each object and uses 3 axis’s. x,y and z. After building a model you can import it to google earth. There are tons of video tutorials and most people get on it and start building within the first 5 minutes. You can build models from scratch, or you can download what you need. People all over the world share what they’ve made on the Google 3D Warehouse. It’s a huge, searchable repository of models, and it’s free. It could be used for drafting, redesigning your house, your car, your girlfriend, lol, not really, but kinda of.

Top 5 technologies.

•April 29, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Top 5 technologies in the past 7 days on www.digg.com

1)Very creative advertisement from WWF [Pic]

This image is portraying the wildlife forest in a personifaction type style. The dying forest represents human lungs dying due to smoking.

2)DiggBar Launches Today!

You can share the digg bar on sites such as twitter and facebook. It allows you to easily share stories and read posts. You can also aquire related and ranmod stories.

3)BREAKING: Warner Bros. Acquires The Pirate Bay

After years of hostility, lawsuits, police raids and heated invective between the two groups, the Pirate Bay has today announced they have settled their differences with US media conglomerate Warner Bros. The largest BitTorrent tracker sold out to Hollywood and the two have agreed a deal. How this affects me: There are many other torrent site that I perfer using such as btjunkie and demonoid.

4)Google’s April Fools Joke for 2009

“New! Gmail Autopilot” links appearing at the top of your G-mail. I’m sort of less impressed by this than the previous years.  Not funny-Says Mark De Jong as he log’ed in to his gmail unawares of april fools.

5)Unplug the Internet: No President should have this power

The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 introduced in the Senate would allow the president to shut down private Internet networks. The legislation also calls for the government to have the authority to demand security data from private networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy restricting such access.
Though the internet contains a vast amount of information that may seen usaful to a President, I do not believe he should hold this power. Admins of websites hold the powers to conceal their information from others. It is their right to withhold their data from the government.

Internet Privacy Concerns

•March 2, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Privacy is one of the major important aspects in our lives that technology is overruling.  But when is too much too much?  You be the judge.  Google latitude is essentially a gps tracker that can be added to any cell phone.  It is real time or “live”.  It shows you where you are on Google maps and can later show you a video feed of where you were and when.  Google advertises it to be used by close friends to see where each other are. Facebook also holds a few privacy concerns as is can be used by the law to be legally binding.  Uploading images of oneself has also been a major concern with privacy on social networking sites.  The internet can restrict our privacy by tracking our phone, legally bind us, allow anyone to view our pictures.   Should employers be able to use this information to look up current or new employees?

One important note regarding google latitude is that it is only enables when the cellphone user received a text message via google latitude and accepts. Google latitude can be used by friends to see where each other are or by parents who want to check on their children.  While people may think the government may use this to be able to track them the sad truth is they already can and have been able to for sometime.  If one were to read their hundred page contract to telus, shaw, koodo, or bell they would come across something giving the Government the right to use these companies to trace their calls.  I do not believe this restricts privacy as you must agree to use it.  My only one concern is that someone may hack into the system or find a loops hole enabling them to track anyone.

When Facebook first came out it was impossible for a user to fully delete their account.  This caused many problems when people had embarrassing information on facebook.  Later after many complaints this was changes and by contacting facebook an account could be deleted. Facebook can also legally bind you for incriminating information.  Other networking sites such as myspace do not have these contracts. Facebook gets money by aquiring information about it’s users and displaying adds to that may interest them.   While some may view this as an attack on our privacy it does not disturb me what so ever. I believe that facebook should use this as we do not need to pay anything to use it.

The majority of people with social networking sites upload pictures of themselves.  While this may seem safe there is no way to guarantee that their pictures are strictly accessible to those using facebook. Privacy is often a concern for embarrassing images, often uploaded by friends against the users will.  While the user may get facebook to delete the image, once something is on the internet it never fully deleted.  Whether posted on another site, saved on someone’s offline WebPages, or stored on a flash or hard drive, those images will haunt the user for life. Images may also be used for incriminating evidence.

The privacy of an employee.  Many employee’s dislike their employers or do not wish them to be involved in their social life. This may be affected by social networking sites.  Your social life is not affected to your job or vice versa.  The quantity or quality of work done by workers should be acknowledged not their social life.  If an employer would want to know more about a possible future employee they should contact a their previous boss rather than use the internet. I do not think that employers should use the internet to research possible

The basics of binary

•December 12, 2008 • Leave a Comment

 

Adding two binary numbers together is like adding decimal numbers, except 1 + 1 = 10 (in binary, that is), so you have to carry the one to the next column: some examples:

    0001
+ 0100
  —-
  0101 (no carries to get this)

    0001
+ 0001
  —-
  0010 (1 plus 1 is 10, carry the 1 to the next column)

    0011
+ 0011
  —-
  0110 (1 + 1 = 10, so carry; then 1 + 1 + 1 = 11, so carry again)

Base 10:

0000 = 0
0001 = 1
0010 = 2
0011 = 3
0100 = 4
0101 = 5
0110 = 6
0111 = 7
1000 = 8
1001 = 9

1 bit (b) = 0 or 1 = one binary digit

  • 1 kilobit ( kb) = 10^3 bits = 1,000 bits
  • 1 Megabit (Mb) = 10^6 bits = 1,000,000 bits
  • 1 Gigabit (Gb) = 10^9 bits = 1,000,000,000 bits 
     
  • or….
  • 8bits = 1byte

    1024bytes=1kb

    1024kbites=1mb

    1024mbs=1gb

    1024gb=1tb

     The Standard ASCII Character Set

             Today we learned about ASCII and the relationship between words and binary codes. Here is a chart:

        Least Significant Bits
        0
    0000
    1
    0001
    2
    0010
    3
    0011
    4
    0100
    5
    0101
    6
    0110
    7
    0111
    8
    1000
    9
    1001
    A
    1010
    B
    1011
    C
    1100
    D
    1101
    E
    1110
    F
    1111
    M
    o
    s
    tS
    i
    g
    n
    i
    f
    i
    c
    a
    n
    tB
    i
    t
    s

     

    0
    000
    NUL
    (0)
    00
    SOH
    (1)
    01
    STX
    (2)
    02
    ETX
    (3)
    03
    EOT
    (4)
    04
    ENQ
    (5)
    05
    ACK
    (6)
    06
    BEL
    (7)
    07
    BS
    (8)
    08
    HT
    (9)
    09
    LF
    (10)
    0A
    VT
    (11)
    0B
    FF
    (12)
    0C
    CR
    (13)
    0D
    SO
    (14)
    0E
    SI
    (15)
    0F
    1
    001
    DLE
    (16)
    10
    DC1
    (17)
    11
    DC2
    (18)
    12
    DC3
    (19)
    13
    DC4
    (20)
    14
    NAK
    (21)
    15
    SYN
    (22)
    16
    ETB
    (23)
    17
    CAN
    (24)
    18
    EM
    (25)
    19
    SUB
    (26)
    1A
    ESC
    (27)
    1B
    FS
    (28)
    1C
    GS
    (29)
    1D
    RS
    (30)
    1E
    US
    (31)
    1F
    2
    010
    SP
    (32)
    20
    !
    (33)
    21

    (34)
    22
    #
    (35)
    23
    $
    (36)
    24
    %
    (37)
    25
    &
    (38)
    26

    (39)
    27
    (
    (40)
    28
    )
    (41)
    29
    *
    (42)
    2A
    +
    (43)
    2B
    ,
    (44)
    2C
    -
    (45)
    2D
    .
    (46)
    2E
    /
    (47)
    2F
    3
    011
    0
    (48)
    30
    1
    (49)
    31
    2
    (50)
    32
    3
    (51)
    33
    4
    (52)
    34
    5
    (53)
    35
    6
    (54)
    36
    7
    (55)
    37
    8
    (56)
    38
    9
    (57)
    39
    :
    (58)
    3A
    ;
    (59)
    3B
    <
    (60)
    3C
    =
    (61)
    3D
    >
    (62)
    3E
    ?
    (63)
    3F
    4
    100
    @
    (64)
    40
    A
    (65)
    41
    B
    (66)
    42
    C
    (67)
    43
    D
    (68)
    44
    E
    (69)
    45
    F
    (70)
    46
    G
    (71)
    47
    H
    (72)
    48
    I
    (73)
    49
    J
    (74)
    4A
    K
    (75)
    4B
    L
    (76)
    4C
    M
    (77)
    4D
    N
    (78)
    4E
    O
    (79)
    4F
    5
    101
    P
    (80)
    50
    Q
    (81)
    51
    R
    (82)
    52
    S
    (83)
    53
    T
    (84)
    54
    U
    (85)
    55
    V
    (86)
    56
    W
    (87)
    57
    X
    (88)
    58
    Y
    (89)
    59
    Z
    (90)
    5A
    [
    (91)
    5B
    \
    (92)
    5C
    ]
    (93)
    5D
    ^
    (94)
    5E
    _
    (95)
    5F
    6
    110
    `
    (96)
    60
    a
    (97)
    61
    b
    (98)
    62
    c
    (99)
    63
    d
    (100)
    64
    e
    (101)
    65
    f
    (102)
    66
    g
    (103)
    67
    h
    (104)
    68
    i
    (105)
    69
    j
    (106)
    6A
    k
    (107)
    6B
    l
    (108)
    6C
    m
    (109)
    6D
    n
    (110)
    6E
    o
    (111)
    6F
    7
    111
    p
    (112)
    70
    q
    (113)
    71
    r
    (114)
    72
    s
    (115)
    73
    t
    (116)
    74
    u
    (117)
    75
    v
    (118)
    76
    w
    (119)
    77
    x
    (120)
    78
    y
    (121)
    79
    z
    (122)
    7A
    {
    (123)
    7B
    |
    (124)
    7C
    }
    (125)
    7D
    ~
    (126)
    7E
    DEL
    (127)
    7F

     

     

    
    Method 2:
    
    So, how can I convert the binary number 1101 to a good-old decimal number? The best way to this is construct a table in which you can do some simple arithmetic operations to solve the conversion! Let’s try it! 
    
    1.         First, I want to write the binary number in a row, separating the digits into columns: 
    
    Number 1 1 0 1
    2.          3.        Next, I want to decide whether each digit placeholder is “ON” or “OFF.” The reason for this will become a little clearer in a few minutes, but for right now just remember that a “1″ is “ON” and a “0″ is “OFF.” When we calculate the exponential expressions, we don’t have to calculate any digit placeholders that are turned off:
    Number 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON ON OFF ON
    4.         5.        In the third step, we write the exponential expressions (”powers of two”) that represent each placeholder and multiply each expression by 1. We do this only for the placeholders that are turned ON. For the placeholders which are turned OFF, we simply bring down the zero from the number itself:
    Number 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON ON OFF ON
    Exponential Expression 23*1 22*1 0 20*1
    6.         7.        Now, we can calculate the exponents to get a simple multiplication expression for each placeholder. Again, we do this only for placeholders which are turned “ON.” Again, we bring down the zero if the placeholder is turned “OFF”:
    Number 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON ON OFF ON
    Exponential Expression 23*1 22*1 0 20*1
    Calculated Exponent 8*1 4*1 0 1*1
    8.          9.       In the fifth step, we solve the multiplication expressions from step #4. Again, we bring down any zeros for placeholders which are turned OFF:
    Number 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON ON OFF ON
    Exponential Expression 23*1 22*1 0 20*1
    Calculated Exponent 8*1 4*1 0 1*1
    Solved Multiplication 8 4 0 1
    10.       11.       In the final step, we add all the multiplication answers from step #5 together to get our decimal number!
    Number 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON ON OFF ON
    Exponential Expression 23*1 22*1 0 20*1
    Calculated Exponent 8*1 4*1 0 1*1
    Solved Multiplication 8 4 0 1
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value 8+4+0+1=13
      Let’s take a look at another conversion. This time, we’ll try 101101:
    Number 1 0 1 1 0 1
    ON/OFF ON OFF ON ON OFF ON
    Exponential Expression 25*1 0 23*1 22*1 0 20*1
    Calculated Exponent 32*1 0 8*1 4*1 0 1*1
    Solved Multiplication 32 0 8 4 0 1
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value 32+0+8+4+0+1=45
          Why not try some on your own? Convert the following from binary to decimal. Click the answers link for each table for that table’s correct answers:
    Number 1 1 1
    ON/OFF      
    Exponential Expression      
    Calculated Exponent      
    Solved Multiplication      
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value  
    Answer  
     
    Number 1 0 1 1
    ON/OFF        
    Exponential Expression        
    Calculated Exponent        
    Solved Multiplication        
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value  
    Answer
     
    Number 1 0 1 1 1
    ON/OFF          
    Exponential Expression          
    Calculated Exponent          
    Solved Multiplication          
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value  
    Answer
     
    Number 1 1 1 1 0 0
    ON/OFF            
    Exponential Expression            
    Calculated Exponent            
    Solved Multiplication            
    Add to Calculate Decimal Value  
    Answer
     
    [Top of the Page]
        Method 3: Binary numbers all consist of combinations of the two digits ‘0′ and ‘1′. These are some examples of binary numbers: 1 10 1010 11111011 11000000 10101000 00001100 01011101 Engineers and mathematicians sometimes call the binary numbering system a base-two system because binary numbers only contain two digits. By comparison, our normal decimal number system is a base-ten system. Hexadecimal numbers (discussed later) are a base-sixteen system. Converting From Binary to Decimal Numbers All binary numbers have equivalent decimal representations and vice versa. Our handy Binary-Decimal Number Converter performs these calculations automatically for you. To convert binary and decimal numbers manually, you must apply the mathematical concept of positional values. The positional value concept is simple: With both binary and decimal numbers, the actual value of each digit depends on its position (how “far to the left”) within the number. For example, in the decimal number 124, the digit ‘4′ represents the value “four,” but the digit ‘2′ represents the value “twenty,” not “two.” The ‘2′ represents a larger value than the ‘4′ in this case because it lies further to the left in the number. Likewise in the binary number 1111011, the rightmost ‘1′ represents the value “one,” but the leftmost ‘1′ represents a much higher value (”sixty-four” in this case). In mathematics, the base of the numbering system determines how much to value digits by position. For base-ten decimal numbers, multiply each digit on the left by a progressive factor of 10 to calculate its value. For base-two binary numbers, multiply each digit on the left by a progressive factor of 2. Calculations always work from right to left. In the above example, the decimal number 123 works out to: 3 + (10 * 2) + (10*10 * 1) = 123 and the binary number 1111011 converts to decimal as: 1 + (2 * 1) + (2*2 * 0) + (4*2 * 1) + (8*2 * 1)+ (16*2 * 1) + (32*2 * 1) = 123 Therefore, the binary number 1111011 is equal to the decimal number 123. Converting From Decimal to Binary Numbers To convert numbers in the opposite direction, from decimal to binary, requires successive division rather than progressive multiplication. Our Binary-Decimal Number Converter also performs these calculations automatically for you. To manually convert from a decimal to a binary number, start with the decimal number and begin dividing by the binary number base (base “two”). For each step the division results in a remainder of 1, use ‘1′ in that position of the binary number. When the division results in a remainder of 0 instead, use ‘0′ in that position. Stop when the division results in a value of 0. The resulting binary numbers are ordered from right to left. For example, the decimal number 109 converts to binary as follows: 109 / 2 = 54 remainder 1 54 / 2 = 27 remainder 0 27 / 2 = 13 remainder 1 13 / 2 = 6 remainder 1 6 / 2 = 3 remainder 0 3 / 2 = 1 remainder 1 1 / 2 = 0 remainder 1 Therefore the decimal number 109 equals the binary number 1101101.

    Obama vs Mcain, who’s more tech savy?

    •November 9, 2008 • Leave a Comment

          

    The race to the white house using technology as a catalyst for communication. This is what this years election looked like as Barack Obama and John Mcain fought for the presidential post with the help of communication to their voters via technology. The amount of technology and the use of internet has never been suprassed compared to any advertising in the history of humankind. In this essay I will compare and contrast these two opponents campaign websites, show all their ways of communication to the peoples. In the end I will discuss the possibilies of elections in the future and the utilization of technology.

    ( LOL )-(good movie though)-

         After briefly viewing their campaign websites, right of the back I must conclude that Obama’s had a more eye appealing look. Mcains looked simple, yet professional. It is obvious that Obama hired extremely talented web designers.

    One major difference in approach of putting together this sites is Technology – Obama’s Sites is built using PHP(opensource stack = freeworld, new hope & change) McCains site built on .Net framework(closed model no hope). \I believe that the use of technology for Obama’s website would be extremely appealing to those aged 18 – 30. They may have over done the whole “halo” saint look with Obama, but seeing as he reinged victorious It may have worked. Why was Obama favored by young voters?

     

     

     

     

     

    Obama was clearly favored by young voters. He achieved this status by extensive advertising, some of which will be covered through the next couple paragraphs. Obama is  the only presidential candidate to buy ad space in video games. Eighteen games, some of which include: “Guitar Hero” and “Madden 09″, in game ads would appear on billboards throughout the games. Near the launch of the iPhone 3G Obama’s campaign released anl iPhone applet that allowes supporters receive up-to-date campaign news on their iPhone. Obama and Mcain both used “social media”, this is utilizing social sites such as facebook and myspace. The Obama campaign has an official presence on 16 networking and information sharing websites. Some of these include photo sharing sites like flicr and networking sites such as LinkedIn. I think that a vast amount of Obamas votes were achieved by young voters due to video game ads, campaign cell phone updates and applets, and social networking 

     

         We live in the video generation and it is obvious that these candidates used this to the best of their abililities. Both used an extensive amount of online video sharing through sites such as Youtube and Brightcove. On youtube both Barack and John have channels with an immence amount of views, Barack with Channel Views: 19,486,791 and John with Channel Views: 2,177,320. It is obvious that Obama has a higher popularity on youtube with almost 9 times the channel views! A new feature of the 2008 presidential race is that every speech, TV interview and gaffe is publicly available on the web. Both the candidates have dedicated Youtube channels and thousands of supporters have also posted home-made video clips on the web. Supporters are now channeling their voice and opinion through online video sites. It is evident that people are listening due to a video called “Dear Mr.Obama” from the user weneedmccain whom is a Iraq war veteran. This videos has already had over 13 million views.

    you cab watch the video here: 

            

     

           Obama used an immence amount of technology for his campaign but I think that this will just be a standard for the upcoming elections in the future. Future candidates may have online webcam blogs (youtube may have this in the future) where people watching may be picked by the candidate and be allowed to ask questions. Maby two competing candidates could even talk to eachother after talking to their supporters for awhile. There could be suporter rankings and both candidates could choose their top 10 supporters off of this webcam blog and have a large online debate. This would allow everyone to interact closer to their candidate. These online debate could also be viewed and used on cell phones with live video feed and viewed on t.v.

    Digg.com – 3 new Technologies.

    •October 29, 2008 • Leave a Comment

    HP Researchers Build Intelligent Memory

    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/145365/hp_researchers_build_intelligent_memory.html

               This technology uses less power than RAM, is intellegent ( basing decisions on previous data ),  could make computers faster and more compact. I think this technology will be usefull and vital for the future. This applies to me due to the fact that I use my computer every day whether it be gaming, or for rendering or editing videos. Having a faster computer would come in handy and prepare us for the future. It could also lead to artificial tecnology, eg: telling household appliances to do work around the house. I find this possible future slightly disturbing but also very fascinating. 

    First look at Windows 7’s User Interface

    A new design, a more friendly user interface and gadget heaven. These are the words I use to describe Microsoft’s new user interface called Windows 7. These computers are very different from Vista is that they are not made up of all new files. The security here is not as high as it was in the Vista which many believed were too high such as Mac which cleverly exploited this problem in one of their infamous commercials. I believe with this new user interface in Microsofts arsenal mac would not be able to try and exploit the problems of windows so easily. I think this computer will have a good overall feel and have a little of everything, possibly converting mac users to PC. 

     

    Think Firefox 3 is fast? Try Firefox Minefield

    http://news.cnet.com/think-firefox-3-is-fast-try-firefox-minefield/

    It has been said that it has the fastest java script engine on the planet, which means it leaves Google’s Chrome browser in the dust. Many believe this to be correct. Firefix minefield is over 10 percent faster than google chrome the current leading web browser (which im using right now). I will probably download this and try it out soon to see it for myself. I like the user interface ov google chrome but the speed of firefox mindfield may change my mind in the end.

    Gadget – Netgear powerline

    •October 1, 2008 • Leave a Comment

    A small box that just plugs into your wall and transfers a wireless signal throughout your house via your houses wiring.  You then plug in another box where you have wither another pc, an Xbox, or anything that uses an Ethernet cable.                    

    You will never have to worry about wireless security or wires running through your house. This is a perfect solution to anyone who want’s to watch high definition videos on game station or tv, for anyone who has an xbox, a ps3, or a computer.

    Allthough product also has somedownfalls, It does not send out a wireless signal. It also does require enthernet cables so it may clutter up a room. If you have a system that does not use enthernet cables it will not be compatable and will not work. It is also much more expensive than wire at a price of $103.99. Nut alteast you will not have to rip up floor boards or rip up walls to insert wires.

    ENIAC

    •September 15, 2008 • Leave a Comment

     

                  It weighed 30 short tons (27 t), was roughly 8.5 feet by 3 feet by 80 feet (2.6 m by 0.9 m by 26 m), took up 680 square feet (63 m²), and consumed 150 kW of power. Besides its speed, the most remarkable thing about ENIAC was its size. ENIAC contained 17,468 vacuum tubes, 7,200 crystal diodes, 1,500 relays, 70,000 resistors, 10,000 capacitors and around 5 million hand-soldered joints.  Input was possible from an IBM card reader, while an IBM card punch was used for output. These cards could be used to produce printed output offline using an IBM accounting machine, probably the IBM 405. ENIAC used ten-position ring counters to store digits; each digit used 36 tubes, 10 of which were the dual triodes making up the flip-flops of the ring counter. Arithmetic was performed by “counting” pulses with the ring counters and generating carry pulses if the counter “wrapped around”, the idea being to emulate in electronics the operation of the digit wheels of a mechanical adding machine. ENIAC had twenty ten-digit signed accumulators that used ten’s complement representation and could perform 5,000 simple addition or subtraction operations between any of them and a source.

    ENIAC used common octal-base radio tubes of the day; the decimal accumulators were made of 6SN7 flip-flops, while 6L7s, 6SJ7s, 6SA7s and 6AC7s were used in logic functions. Numerous 6L6s and 6V6s served as line drivers to drive pulses through cables between rack assemblies.

    The integrated circuit was independently co-invented by Jack Kilby of Texas Instruments[2] and Robert Noyce of Fairchild Semiconductor [3] around the same time. Kilby recorded his initial ideas concerning the integrated circuit in July 1958 and successfully demonstrated the first working integrated circuit on September 12, 1958.[2] Kilby won the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physics for his part of the invention of the integrated circuit.[4] Robert Noyce also came up with his own idea of integrated circuit, half a year later than Kilby. Noyce’s chip had solved many practical problems that the microchip developed by Kilby had not. Noyce’s chip, made at Fairchild, was made of silicon, whereas Kilby’s chip was made of germanium.The Timex Sinclair 1000 is the North American version of the Sinclair ZX-81, from British based Sinclair Research Ltd. They are nearly identical, except for the name on the front, and minor motherboard layout differences.The first Sinclair computer was the

    ZX-80, released in 1980 for $200.00.
    It was still very popular when they came out with the improved
    ZX-81 in 1981.
    By mid 1982, Timex was selling the ZX-81, renaming it as the ‘Timex Sinclair 1000′. The system shown above has the optional 16K memory expansion unit attached to the back… it’s a calculator.

    As is true of many facets in computing, the phrase “Personal Computer” can be something of a slippery customer. For example, the IBM 610 Auto-Point Computer (1957) was described as being “IBM’s first personal computer” on the premise that it was intended for use by a single operator, but this machine was not based on the stored program concept and it cost $55,000! Other contenders include MIT’s LINC (1963), CTC’s Datapoint 2200 (1971), the Kenbak-1 (1971), and the Xerox Alto (1973), but all of these machines were either cripplingly expensive, relatively unusable, or only intended as experimental projects. So, for our purposes here, we will understand “Personal Computer” to refer to an affordable, general-purpose, microprocessor- based computer intended for the consumer market